Personally, I switched to Haxe, which proved to leverage the FlashPlayer better than AS3 does, and is a far more expressive and elegant language. Now another question is, what you don't like in both AS3 and Processing. From what I can tell, AS3 is a more "serious" language, aiming for developement of applications, whereas Processing focuses on fast prototyping and image processing.There's a number of flash game engines (also dealing with multiplayer etc.) out there, whereas I found similar engines to build on in Processing impossible to find.Flash probably is a better platform for both distribution.Due to Flash's market penetration and a big gaming (and game developement) community:.If you really want this to be a long shot, then you also should consider several factors: If it is just a prototype, both flash and processing are good tools, each having its own strengths and weaknesses. I think, the core question is, where you want to be going with the game. I don't know what Processing uses for rendering, but if it is jOGL, it is possible to outperform FlashPlayer (depending on the kind of graphics). In the case of pacman, this is all a matter of rendering speed. I don't think processing has to necessarily needs to turn out slower, or faster. AS3 means FlashPlayer, Processing means JVM. Well, you're not only choosing languages, but also choosing platforms here. So my question is, what are the people's experience with Processing, and am I really justified in comparing it to ActionScript? Is it suitable for creating games at all? I figure with all the comfort and ease I have creating images, I feel the speed of the program as a whole would be decreased, especially when I introduce algorithms.įurthermore, if it is suitable for creating a simple pac-man game, should I try ActionScript instead anyway? Make sure you do not catch the wrong flavours Ice Cream Raid can be played on both mobile and desktop browsers. While holding the cone drag it across the screen to catch the right falling ice cream flavours.
#Free ms pacman game learn for good how to
Processing isn't so much either but I feel the image processing capabilities of this make it outweigh my negative view of the syntax. How to Play: Once you start the game simply click/tap and drag an empty cone to pull it out. The language, for some reason, isn't that appealing to me. ActionScript is something I have already programmed in, but do not like. However, I wanted to know if the language is suited for a game and possibly resource-intensive code?Īt first glance, this looks almost like a simplified version of Actionscript, a language that tries to easily produce images. The creation of images seems almost trivially easy, which allows me a lot of play-room to mess with the algorithms. I was wondering what merits Processing has as a language capable of creating simple games. I can agree to that, especially because then I can focus on the design of the game rather than the implementation- something I think is more important at this stage. I was suggested to perhaps start with a programming language or platform that uses less overhead than, say, DirectX. I'll simply title this in concordance with my Pac-Man game that I want to make.
0 kommentar(er)
